UK AI Monitor

Prototype. Figures as of October 2026.

The UK can see who uses AI. It can’t yet see what AI changes.

The monitor follows 26 indicators, from who could use AI to what it changes across the economy. Each block below is one indicator. 13 have a solid UK figure, 4 have a partial one, and the rest have none.

Five areas, from access to impact

The monitor sorts every indicator into five areas. Each asks a different question, and each is harder to answer than the one before. Taken in order, they show where the evidence runs out.

    Four readings

    What the best current data says, from adoption to the only outcome figure the UK publishes.

      What the data shows

      The UK measures adoption well. These charts draw on its strongest sources.

      Business use has tripled since 2023

      Share of UK businesses using at least one AI technology.

      ONS Business Insights and Conditions Survey. The June 2025 point is derived from the 8-point rise ONS reported to June 2026.

      Bigger firms and tech firms lead

      Share using AI by firm size, and in the industry that uses it most, September 2026.

      ONS Business Insights and Conditions Survey, wave 165.

      Three answers to “how many people use AI?”

      Each source asks a different question of a different population. The spread is a finding in itself.

      ONS Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (67% derived from 33% reporting no use); Ofcom Adults’ Media Use and Attitudes 2026; Microsoft AI Diffusion Report.

      A steep age gap

      Adults using AI for work or education, Great Britain, June 2026.

      ONS Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, June 2026.

      More use, less confidence

      Adults in Great Britain who expect AI to benefit them, and who think it carries more risks than benefits.

      ONS Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, November 2023 to June 2026.

      All 26 indicators

      Grouped into five areas that run from access to impact. Each shows the latest UK figure, where one exists, and its source. How the areas and shading work.

      What it would take to see impact

      The UK already runs the surveys. The gaps are in linking data, measuring outcomes and seeing inside organisations.

      • Link adoption to firm performance

        ONS already knows which firms say they use AI. Linking those answers to firm-level productivity, turnover and employment would show whether adopters pull ahead. It is the biggest missing piece.

      • Report results where government uses AI

        Move transparency records from describing tools to reporting what changed: processing times, error rates and service quality, before and after.

      • See inside organisations

        A voluntary panel of organisations sharing anonymised data on licences, active users, depth of use and tasks. It is the only route to AI embedded in everyday software.

      • Count harms as well as benefits

        A shared way for regulators to record AI-related complaints, incidents and findings, so harms can be tracked alongside adoption.